芬兰托育服务保教结合的制度逻辑及其教育启示

董柯筠

doi:10.70693/jyxb.v2i2.487

Authors

董柯筠福建师范大学

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70693/jyxb.v2i2.487

Keywords:

芬兰；托育服务；制度逻辑；保教结合

Abstract

我国托育服务体系尚未形成统一的管理网络，存在“保”与“教”相分离的问题。探究芬兰托育服务保教结合的制度逻辑，可以为我国托育服务的未来提供借鉴。本文基于制度逻辑理论，系统分析了国家、专业、医疗、社区、家庭五重制度逻辑的核心诉求及其互动机制。研究发现，芬兰保教结合形成的原因是五重制度逻辑通过共同目标、规则和行动实现了协同整合。结合中国托育服务的现状，我国应确立教育框架的主导地位，构建保教结合课程体系，强化专业逻辑的中介功能，激活多元主体的参与活力。

References

[1]国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴-2025[EB/OL]. (2025)[2026-01-18]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2025/indexch.htm.

[2]闻英,邹桂阳.制度重构与价值重塑：生育友好型社会的双重构建路径[J].决策科学,2025,(04):15-24.

[3]任沙沙.托育服务制度化的实践困境与纾解——基于社会学制度主义视角[J].北京教育学院学报,2025,39(05):76-84.

[4]UNICEF Innocenti. (2020). Worlds of Influence: Understanding what shapes child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card No. 16). UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti.

[5]Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland. (2024). Act on Early Childhood Education and Care (540/2018; amendments up to 700/2024 included).

[6]周雪光,艾云.多重逻辑下的制度变迁:一个分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2010,(04):132-150+223.

[7]THORNTON P H, OCASIO W, LOUNSBURY M. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2012.

[8]Karila, K., & Kupila, P. (2023). Multi-professional teamwork in Finnish early childhood education and care. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 17(1), 21.

[9]孙蔷蔷,王轶晰,龙正渝.OECD国家婴幼儿照护服务的经验与启示[J].学前教育研究,2025,(04):35-46.

[10]Finnish National Agency for Education. (2022). National core curriculum for early childhood education and care.

[11]Rutanen, N., & Hännikäinen, M. (2019). Finland: Becoming and the Youngest Children at Home and in ECEC. In M. Gradovski, E. E. Ødegaard, N. Rutanen, J. Sumsion, C. Mika, & E. J. White, The First 1000 Days of Early Childhood (Vol. 2, pp. 93–108). Springer Nature Singapore.

[12]Fröbel, F. (1909). Friedrich Froebel’s pedagogics of the kindergarten, or, his ideas concerning the play and playthings of the child. (J. Jarvis, Trans.). In W. Lange (Ed.). New York: D. Appleton and Company.

[13]李梓怡,刘丽伟.贯彻公平普惠理念,赋能家庭助力托育——芬兰0～3岁婴幼儿照护服务的主要做法及启示[J].早期儿童发展,2023,(01):38-48.

[14]Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. (2007). Child Welfare Act (No. 417/2007; amendments up to 1292/2013 included).

[15]Republic of Finland. (2016). Act on Client Fees in Early Childhood Education and Care (1503/2016).

[16]Republic of Finland. (2021). Act on Central Government Transfers to Municipalities for Basic Public Services (618/2021).

[17]万丹,周文雯.我国托育服务供需错配的表现、成因及破解路径[J].当代教育论坛,2026,(01):50-57.

[18]洪秀敏,陶鑫萌.改革开放40年我国0～3岁早期教育服务的政策与实践[J].学前教育研究,2019,(02):3-11.

[19]黄靖,傅静思,蔡晅怡.我国婴幼儿照护服务政策执行的困境与优化路径[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2025,43(12):37-41.